Print Page | Contact Us | Report Abuse | Sign In | Apply Now
GAFM Community Blog
Blog Home All Blogs
Welcome to the GAFM Community Blog. Members can submit articles here to share with all site visitors. After you submit your article our staff will review prior to posting.


Search all posts for:   


Top tags: accreditation 

CWM Chartered Wealth Manager ®

Posted By George Mentz, Thursday, August 9, 2018
Chartered Wealth Manager  ®

The Chartered Wealth Manager ® is a designation awarded by the IBS International Board of Standards and GAFM. The Chartered Wealth Manager ® was the first US wealth management designation to be recognized in the Wall Street Journal and in the FINRA/NASD Guides in 2004. The global financial dictionary Investopedia recognizes the Chartered Wealth Manager ® also.

Chartered Wealth Manager ® – Chartered Designation Status is the distinction of a qualified industry professional. The CWM Chartered Wealth Manager ® shows your professional competence to employers, colleagues and customers in the areas of: financial planning, investments, risk, economics, tax, retirement, estate planning, and money and banking.

Certification Requirements

Masters degree in finance, law, economics, maths, or wealth management and over 5 years of experience. Professors, PhDs, CPAs and Lawyers may apply for individual exemptions.

CWM ® Chartered Wealth Manager ®

An GAFM ® Owned and Issued since 1996. A Certification chartered in the United States of America
The CWM® Chartered Wealth Manager ® professional certification from the GAFM ®Global Academy of Financial Management® is the first graduate wealth management Charter & Board certification in the world as featured in the Investopedia, Forbes,China Daily, Financial Times, Black Enterprise, Wall Street Journal, and Money Manager[1][2] that was created and founded by the Board of Standards and the GAFM Global Academy of Financial Management [3][4].
The US government trademarked CWM ® Chartered Wealth Manager GAFM ®Certification [5] and Certified credential is only available for wealth managers with an accredited masters degree, law degree, CPA, PhD or specialized executive training from an ABA accredited law school [6] or other approved program in Asia, Europe, India, Latin America or Africa.


The CWM Certified ( Chartered Wealth Manager ) [7] designation and post-graduate qualification is exclusively issued and conferred by the USA Board of Standards Global Academy of Financial Management®(GAFM) [8][9] The CWM wealth management certification & designation is similar to financial planning certification but is as a graduate certification and curriculum in high net worth consulting and has always required a government recognized education and degree.[10] The CWM® Law School Curriculum has been approved for use with ABA Accredited Law School Programs.[11] Wealth Management is a profession and career that many bankers and investment professionals are entering.[12] Like any accredited law school graduate courses, the GAFM CWM certification courses[13] will count toward a post graduate degree such as a LLM or JSM, will count for continuing education for CPA and Law Licensing, and may count towards the CPA exam eligibility.
The CWM Chartered Wealth Manager Board Certification [14] from GAFM USA requires knowledge in 12 key areas:[15] and is referenced in the Global Designation Directory and on the FINRA US Government Regulatory Website [16][17]

1. Estate Planning and Trusts 2. Asset Management 3. Portfolio Management 4. International Taxation 5. Retirement Law 6. Economics 7. Investments 8. Money and Banking 9. High Net Worth Consulting 10. Relationship Management, Compliance, and Ethics 11. Business Entities & Organizations 12. Risk Management and Insurance

Apply today for Fast Track Approval

This post has not been tagged.


Leadership Theories and Styles in Clinical and Organizational Settings ​ Henry Oh, PhD, MPM, CLC

Posted By Administration, Monday, June 18, 2018

Leadership Theories and Styles in Clinical and Organizational Settings


Henry Oh, PhD, MPM, CLC




The existence of numerous leadership theories can sometimes be too complex.  Many articles and research papers have been written about leadership theories, styles and practices.  Most of these papers have focused on the applications of leadership in business, politics and education.  Academic papers on clinical leadership have been written mostly for nursing, medicine and public health. This paper presents five (5) of the leadership theories and their applications in allied health. The discussion describes how the Fiedler’s Contingency Theory, Path-Goal Theory, Transactional Theory, Transformational Theory and Servant Leadership Theory, apply to clinical and organizational settings.


Many leaders possess a diversity of skills, competencies or characteristics (Gardner, 2000). There are individuals who are primarily leaders but may also possess managerial skills, while there are individuals who are primarily managers but may also exhibit some leadership qualities. There is also a group of individuals who strongly possess both leadership and managerial qualities.


A clear distinction should be made between a leader and a manager. Generally, leaders influence their followers to pursue specific goals, while managers direct their staff members to complete tasks.


Curt Richardson (2013) differentiates leaders and managers as follows:


Leaders have a unique ability to rally employees around a vision. Because their belief in the vision is so strong, employees will naturally want to follow them. Leaders also tend to be willing to take risks in pursuit of the vision.


Managers, on the other hand, are more adept at executing the vision in a very systemic way and directing employees on how to do so. They can see all of the intricate moving parts and understand how to make them harmonize. Managers are usually very risk-adverse.


Donna Flagg (2016) further describes the differences between a manager and a leader in the following:


Managing requires getting work done.  It requires the management of people and day-to-day organization of logistics, communication, workflow and tasks.  It is making sure that things run smoothly in the same way that moving parts of a machine work together to create a functional whole.


Leading, on the other hand, is about inspiration, having a mission, envisioning a future and being able to communicate it in a way that motivates other people to believe in a purpose – and participate in it. Implicitly, workplace leaders have followers.  Managers technically, don’t.  Not necessarily.

Many research studies have been conducted on several widely popular leadership theories:  Great Man Theory, Trait Theory, Contingency Theories, Behavioral Theories, Transactional Theory, and Transformational Theory. 


Several modifications or sub-categories came forth from these theories.  For example, associated theories that have been developed from the Contingency Theories include: Fiedler’s Contingency Theory, Path-Goal Theory, Cognitive Resource Theory, and Strategic Contingency Theory (


Fiedler’s Contingency Theory in Clinical Practice


Fiedler’s Contingency Theory is one of the leadership theories that have been widely studied by scholars. It is the result of more than 30 years of study by Fred Fiedler and his associates (Kreitner and Cassidy, 2004). 


The Fiedler’s Contingency Theory is situational in nature since “He (Fiedler) showed for example that a leader who is more directive and focused on achieving targets might be a better leader in an unfavorable situation” (Coleman and Earley, 2005).


According to Fiedler’s Contingency Theory:


Effective leadership depends not only on the style of leading but on the control over a situation. There needs to be good leader-member relations, task with clear goals and procedures, and the ability for the leader to mete out rewards and punishments ('s-contingency-theory.html).


Clinical situations where Fiedler’s Contingency Theory would apply:

·        Leading a code blue team in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to ensure that established guidelines are followed

·        Supervising laboratory personnel in performing laboratory procedures to ensure a timely report and accuracy of laboratory results

·        Directing and coordinating an emergency response team during trauma or disaster

·        Directing and coordinating the daily operations in a complex medical office


Working in a clinical setting can be stressful and overwhelming especially during emergencies, when there is a high volume of workload, and complicated further with staff shortage.  A manager or supervisor must take the lead to identify priorities, assign workload, find resources, and keep the situation under control.  The leader can effectively monitor the needs of the unit or department when the situation is under control.  


First and foremost, the safety of the patients is the goal. When patient safety is compromised, the leader needs to correct the situation.  A compromised situation can include equipment malfunction, shortage of supplies, error in the procedure, incompetence of staff, inefficient operations system, delays, late reports, and conflicts.  Any of these situations is critical to patient care. Fiedler’s Contingency Theory emphasizes control over situation, and tasks with clear goals and procedures.  This theory appropriately applies to leadership in clinical practice.


Fiedler’s Contingency Theory and Authoritarian Leadership Theory


Leadership in the workplace involves various styles along a continuum. The continuum ranges from a highly authoritarian leadership role style, in which the leader makes all decisions and tells followers what to do, to a highly democratic leadership style, in which the leader and followers discuss problems and jointly make decisions that affect their work.  The style that is most effective depends on the nature of the situation and the needs and characteristics of the followers. 


In stressful work situations that require rapid and highly efficient job performance, productivity and satisfaction are more likely to be maintained under authoritarian leadership.  Employees recognize that the nature of their work does not allow time for a participative approach.  For example, firefighters must respond to a fire alarm immediately and follow the directions of their chief. They do not have time to hold a committee meeting to determine the best way to deal with the fire.


Transactional and Transformational Leadership in the Clinical Setting


It is essential that anyone, whose goal is to become a manager in a medical office or department, or a leader in a clinical division that oversees several departments, know the differences between the transactional and transformational leadership styles.  To be effective in meeting the goals of a department or division, and in leading a team of healthcare staff, an individual needs to figure out which leadership style works in the best interest of the department, the division and the subordinate employees.


Transactional leadership refers to leading an organization where tasks must get accomplished through transactions such as “rewards and punishments.”  “It is transaction in the form of reciprocity, the idea that the relationship between leader and followers develops from the exchange of reward, such as performance-based pay, bonuses, promotion, recognition, and praise, in return for work well done” (Kippenberger, 2002).


In the clinical setting, “rewards” may include weekends off, more day shifts than night shifts, reimbursements for membership fees, attendance at seminars, continuing education, complimentary meals, promotion, salary increase and other incentives. In contrast, “punishments” mean no incentives earned. It is entirely based on transaction conducted between a manager and staff members.  The clinical manager is primarily concerned with the daily operations of the department. 


Schultz and Schultz (2006) describe transactional leadership as follows:


Transactional leaders focus on increasing the efficiency of established routines and procedures and are more concerned with following        existing rules than with making changes to the structure of the organization.


Transformational leadership involves influence by a leader on subordinates, but the effect of the influence is to empower subordinates who also become leaders in the process of transforming the organization (Muchinsky, 1997).


According to Kippenberger (2002):


Transformational leadership, on the other hand, is more about hearts and minds empowering people rather than using rewards to control them.  Because transformation means change, such leadership is seen as releasing people to learn, to seek change and improvement.  So it is based on trust on the part of the leader and understanding, skill, dedication and commitment on the part of the followers.


Transactional leadership is best suited for supervisors and middle managers who run the daily operations of the department.  They are responsible for the smooth operations of the departments.  Laboratory managers, shift supervisors and section heads are examples of transactional leaders who ensure that laboratory staff members perform their duties and responsibilities in the processing of specimens and reporting of laboratory results in a timely manner. 


Laboratory managers are also transformational leaders who develop strategic plans and visions to lead the department into a higher level of complexity in laboratory diagnostics and technological advancement. Division managers are those individuals who oversee two (2) or more allied health departments that may include laboratory, radiology, respiratory therapy, and other related units.  Division managers need to be strong transformational leaders who can empower their subordinates to improve further the quality of service of their departments, as well as their own professional development.


David Ingram (2017) describes in a more practical way both transactional and transformational leadership styles below:

A transactional leader generally does not look ahead in strategically guiding an organization to a position of market leadership; instead, these managers are solely concerned with making sure everything flows smoothly today. A transformational leader goes beyond managing day-to-day operations and crafts strategies for taking his company, department or work team to the next level of performance and success.            


Path-Goal Theory and Servant Leadership Theory in Organizations


Path-Goal Theory is a derivative of expectancy theory where followers would be motivated if they feel competent, if their efforts are rewarded, and if their work is valued or appreciated (Northhouse, 2016). Path-goal theory assumes that effective leaders can enhance employee motivation by clarifying work goals; having meaningful reward with goal attainment; and guidance on how goals and rewards can be attained.  Basically it means that leaders should motivate their followers by providing clear goals and guidance on how to achieve them. The key here is motivation.


An important aspect in the application of the Path-Goal Theory is identifying the needs of the followers or subordinates.  As Northhouse (2016) pointed out, “…followers who have strong needs for affiliation prefer supportive leadership because friendly and concerned leadership is a source of satisfaction. For followers who are dogmatic and authoritarian and have to work in uncertain situations, path-goal theory suggests directive leadership because it provides psychological structure and task clarity.” 


Servant leadership originated from Robert Greenleaf in 1970 when he introduced the empowerment movement (Kippenberger, 2002). The individual practicing servant leadership develops the followers’ full potential by providing a comfortable environment where they feel free and so they can accomplish better.  The servant leader puts the needs and concerns of other people first to help them grow, improve and work towards their goals. The servant leader’s approach is to serve others first.  Servant leadership is effective when the leader has a strong motivation and deeply interested in helping others or followers who are open and receptive (Northouse, 2016). Followers achieve greater self-actualization.  Maslow’s Humanistic Learning Theory puts self-actualization in the highest Hierarchy of Needs (Bastable et al., 2011).


Organizations, associations, societies and other groups would benefit from the principles of Path-Goal Theory and Servant Leadership Theory.


The Future of Organizational Leadership


The success and continuity of an organization depends on the effectiveness of succession planning and the availability of highly-motivated individuals interested to lead the organization.


Every organization must have a leadership development plan in place to ensure the continuity and smooth operations of its divisions or departments.  According to Cascio (2011), “Research shows that planning for leadership succession should be part and parcel of the way a company is managed. Grooming potential leaders is a process that takes years…The best organizations are consciously strategic in their leadership planning.”


The most common challenge to succession planning is retirement or resignation of a leader without anyone better prepared and trained to step in.  As Groves (2006) adds, “US workforce statistics suggest that succession planning poses an incredible challenge as the baby boomer generation retires and far fewer college-educated workers are prepared to replace them.” 


To help individuals who have the potentials to become future leaders, training and mentoring are integral or essential to effectively develop the next generation of leaders. The younger generation should be provided with the tools and resources that would give them exposure to leadership theories, styles and practices, and encourage them to move toward those models suitable for them.




Bastable, Susan, et. al. Health Professional As Educator.  Massachusetts: Jones and Barlett

Learning, 2011.


Cascio, Wayne. Leadership Succession: How to Avoid a Crisis. June 2011. 21 June 2017.



Coleman, Marianne and Peter Earley. Leadership and Management in Education. New York:    Oxford University Press, 2005.


Curt, Richardson, Are you a Leader or a Manager? There’s a Difference. June 2013. 19 February

2018. <>


Dubrin, Andrew. Essentials of Management. Ohio: South Western Cengage Learning, 2009.


Flagg, Donna. The Difference Between Managers and Leaders. Psychology Today. August 2016.

February 19, 2018. <>


Gardner, John. On Leadership. New York: The Free Press, 1990.


Groves, Kevin. Integrating Leadership Development and Succession Planning Best Practices.

March 2006. 21 June 2017. < appliedresearch/content/groves3.pdf>


Ingram, David. Transformational Leadership Vs. Transactional Leadership Definition. 19 February

2018. <



Kippenberger, Tony. Leadership Styles. United Kingdom: Capstone Publishing, 2002.


Kreitner, Robert and Carlene Cassidy. Management. Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning,


Leadership Theories. February 19, 2018. <       



Muchinsky, Paul. Psychology Applied to Work. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1997.


Northhouse, Peter. Leadership Theory and Practice. Los Angeles: Sage, 2016.



This post has not been tagged.

PermalinkComments (0)

The GAFM and Society of French Engineers have signed Mutual Alliance Agreement

Posted By George Mentz, Wednesday, June 13, 2018

The GAFM AAPM and International Board of Standards Represented by GAFM EU President Italy Chapter of GAFM.AAPM.USA and the SNIPF Represented by President of SNIPF  have signed during the Forum of Toulouse a Mutual Agreement.

The SNIPF: National Society of Professional Engineers of France is an Association governed by the law of July 1, 1901, SNIPF . The SNIPF National Certification Commission Board assess the applicant for the Certificates of Competence Professional Engineer (CDCIP) and the title of IPF (INGENIEURS PROFESSIONNELS DE FRANCE) of IPF (INGENIEURS PROFESSIONNELS DE FRANCE) The GAFM & AAPM based in Europe is ISO 29990 Certified and TUV Accredited

Engineers' certifications issued by SNIPF comply with the following three standards

1) International Standard ISO / IEC 17024, under annual COFRAC controls

2) Classification: Certified engineers are listed according to the ISCO - International Standard Classification of Occupations, under the aegis of the ILO / UN,

This certification, meets the requirements of the international standard ISO 17024, is also recognized by 196 countries worldwide;

This Certificate of Competence is linked to the actual exercise of the profession, it is valid for 3 years, and is renewable for a period of 3 years , subject to always performing the function of engineer.

Qualified members of AAPM and GAFM may apply for membership in the SNIPF by contacting the European President of AAPM/GAFM in Italy to submit qualifications and dossiers for review and approval

This post has not been tagged.

PermalinkComments (0)

Become a Certified Master Project Manager (MPM®) 4-Day Course 15 USA Cities & Dates

Posted By George Mentz, Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Become a Certified Master Project Manager (MPM®) 4-Day Course

City & Date with LINK

San Francisco CA - Tue, July 10, 2018 -Fri, July 13, 2018

Bridgewater NJ  Tue, August 07, 2018 - Fri, August 10, 2018

Chicago IL  Tue, August 21, 2018 - Fri, August 24, 2018

Dallas TX  Tue, September 11, 2018 - Fri, September 14, 2018

Washington DC Tue, September 25, 2018 - Fri, September 28, 2018

Orlando FL  Tue, October 02, 2018 - Fri, October 05, 2018

Boston MA  Tue, October 23, 2018 - Fri, October 26, 2018

Houston TX  Tue, November 06, 2018 - Fri, November 09, 2018

Las Vegas NV  Tue, November 13, 2018 - Fri, November 16, 2018

San Diego CA  Tue, December 04, 2018 - Fri, December 07, 2018

Phoenix AZ  Tue, December 11, 2018 - Fri, December 14, 2018

This post has not been tagged.

PermalinkComments (0)

Why Increased Lending Rates Will Hurt the Economy Worldwide

Posted By George Mentz, Wednesday, June 13, 2018

As a student of wealth management and the economy, I am concerned with typical historical government intervention of the past.

Because the present administration is enacting strong policies in key areas of: trade, taxation, competitiveness, and lending rates, this economy has a chance to stabilize for long-term growth.

Maybe we can learn from the mistakes of the recent past.

It seems that preceding the last few bull markets, the U.S. government embraced efficient government tactics of: lower rates of lending, lower taxes and lower regulations.

During Presidents Reagan and with GHW Bush, things were going well, but it seemed that the government intervened with either more taxes, deregulation, savings and loan problems, higher rates of lending, and more regulatory burdens which slowed the economy down.

Remember that there were low rates of lending before Clinton came into office in 1993 which spurred the investment into jobs, the Internet and other things. There were also low rates of lending after the Internet Bubble Burst in 2000 and later in the first few years of President George W. Bush.

I have often wondered if there exists a "middle way" where taxes and lending were at an ideal level of sustainability and growth which also supports jobs and a robust government.

My point is this, I believe we are living that point right now. Therefore, there must be an optimum point where taxes, lending and regulation are low enough to sustain a growing economy and a country that can be competitive in the global marketplace.

If the Federal Reserve raises rates another quarter percent, it may take the momentum out from our economy if the rates go up 1% or more, it may dismantle the market energy.

As for lending, 30 year fixed mortgage rates just jumped from an approximate average of 4% to 4.5 %. If that number goes any higher, the housing lending market will slow considerably unless the Trump administration can ease some of the Dodd-Frank litmus tests & algorithms used by banks to lend money to the millions of workers whose incomes are not on W-2 pay stubs.

Remember there must be a sweet spot for lending. I would guess that 5% or lower on 30 Year mortgages, and less than 7.5% or lower on margin lending for brokerage accounts.

Still, with rates higher, the cost of running government skyrockets to pay the interest in the debt. Thus, lower Fed rates means more money for running government too. In theory, if President Barack Obama had normal interest rates during his administration, the national debt would be as high as 30 trillion.

As for taxes, the new Trump income tax rates will help the middle class have more disposable income, but any “individual mandate Obama taxes” or higher prices of gas at the pump can rob many Americans and businesses of what little they can save.

The corporate tax and small business tax relief, will create more jobs, more disposable income on the local level and will boost spending.

However, if lending rates for business loans, auto loans and margin lending loans go up, this well create less investing and spending.

The genius of essay writing is when the author can explain something at a third-grade level. Thus, if the U.S. becomes a safe-haven for global business with lower taxes, low sovereign risk, and lower regulations; then, the “American Safe Haven” will attract more customers and businesses that want to live here, hire here, do business here, and be here.

So, is the solution as simple as lower rates, less regulation and lower taxes? Well, if you apply the fair tax, fair lending, and fair regulation logic to Wal-Mart and Amazon, then supply side economics is fact and not theory if you assume that the competition has higher taxes, costs and regulatory burdens like Sears or Borders Books.

Again, the key words are productivity and sustainability. You want workers and businesses to be making money and paying taxes, otherwise the government will have too many unfunded liabilities. Moreover, you want government to be lean and agile to keep up with the times.

My wish here is for the Federal Reserve to take a few years off. I would also want Congress to keep federal taxes low and the president to keep regulations fair.

As we have seen in Europe and Asia, and Arabia, successful businesses and people go to where they will have the best government services, best jobs, lower taxes, and the least regulatory burdens. Keep in mind, there are over 50 other American countries and dependent territories outside of the USA and over 100 nations and 5 billion people in Eurasia who want to keep their money and businesses based in a reasonably safe zone.

Also, when your government has so many hidden taxes, it can destabilize business, spending and investing. For example, if you are in New York or California, you could sell a small business and get stuck with a 8-9% state tax, a 3.8% Obamacare Medicare Tax and another.9% Obamacare surcharge. Thus, there can be extra 13-14% tax on your capital gain income or this may also apply to your regular income. Therefore, from a city, state and federal standpoint, there are still several destabilizing factors which can inhibit the economy and hurt workers and retirees.

In the end, we must have a smart government. If we don’t, you end up with all of the rich people and rich companies moving their money and investments elsewhere. In contrast, if you have strong policies, you can recruit and retain excellent people, jobs, businesses and investment from around the world while mitigating unfair trade.

Let's keep America competitive, efficient and sustainable and economic maintain strength during peacetime.

George Mentz JD MBA CWM Chartered Wealth Manager ® is a licensed attorney and CEO of GAFM ® global education, which is an ISO 29990 Certified professional development company operating in over 50 nations. Mentz is an award winning author and advisory board member to several companies around the world in education, charities, and crypto currency.

Read Newsmax: Fed Rate Hikes Could Derail Trump Economic Juggernaut |
Important: Find Your Real Retirement Date in Minutes! More Info Here 

This post has not been tagged.

PermalinkComments (0)

GAFM accredited by TUV and is ISO Certified 29990

Posted By George Mentz, Wednesday, June 13, 2018

The GAFM's International Board of Standards maintains its Accreditation from the TUV - GAFM also has been accredited for ISO Certification of 29990 and ISO Certification of 9001.

Dr. Mentz has stated that, "The GAFM is the 1st certification body in the USA to achieve and maintain ISO 29990 Training Certification and TUV Accreditation."


Tags:  accreditation 

PermalinkComments (0)
GAFM Global Academy of Finance and Management ®
Box 293
1670F East Cheyenne Mtn. Blvd.
Colorado Springs, CO 80906